Parrillo v. Chalk
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
As all schoolchildren learn, appearances can be deceiving. See, e.g., “The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing,” in The Fables of Aesop 94 (Joseph Jacobs ed., 1902). But their absence in a lawsuit can be fatal to the finality of any settlement negotiated with a lawyer who neither entered an appearance nor became an attorney of record for one of the settling parties.
For the reasons that follow, we hold that when attempting to resolve a lawsuit with an attorney purporting to represent the plaintiff, a defendant is not entitled to rely on any settlement authority claimed by such an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Louis Fennell v. Tlb Kent Company and Joseph PietrykaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Cohen v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
- Nash v. Y & T DistributorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In Matter of SinesiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- Koval v. SIMON TELELECT. INC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Casa DiMario, Inc. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- McBurney v. RoszkowskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- May v. Penn TV & Furniture Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Labossiere v. BersteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.