Legal Opinion
United States v. David Hayashi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1994No. 92-10044PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge BROWNING.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, Alan C. Kay, District Judge, Presiding.
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed on September 27, 1993, are amended as follows: [Editor’s Note: Amendments have been incorporated for purposes of publication].
With these amendments, a majority of the panel has voted to deny the appellee’s petition for rehearing.
An active judge made a sua sponte request to rehear the case en banc. The government also requested en banc rehearing in its response papers. The matter failed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Third Nat. Bank in Nashville v. Impac Limited, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Malcolm Lee WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Darryl VowiellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Michael Dwayne CombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Antonio Lara Solis, United States of America v. Manuel Salazar SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- City of Sausalito v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- People for Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Miami SeaquariumDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- City of Sausalito v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.