Legal Opinion
Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 21, 2014No. Civil Action No. 10-1055-RGAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANDREWS, U.S. District Judge:
Presently before the Court are Defendant Microsoft’s Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment (D.I. 298) and related briefing (D.I. 299, 365,467), and Plaintiff Robocast, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Unenforceability and No Unclean Hands (D.I. 295) and related briefing (D.I. 296, 360, 410). The Court has heard helpful oral argument on both motions. (D.I. 446).
I. BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement action. Plaintiff Robocast, Inc. has accused Defendant Microsoft Corporation of infringing U.S. Patent No. 7,155,451 (“the ‘451 patent”).…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Corteva Agriscience LLC v. Inari Agriculture, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- NexStep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019