Tullis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
There is no statement of facts in the record. The only question presented on the appeal is the validity of defendant’s plea- in bar of a contract and agreement with the district attorney for immunity from prosecution in this case in consideration of his turning State’s evidence. • ■
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. We have carefully read this record, as well as the briefs filed by both parties. The brief of the Assistant Attorney-General fully presents the statement of the case, and discusses the question involved in the appeal and the law applicable thereto. It accords with our view of the law applicable to that issue, and is a very elaborate and able exposition of the law involved in this appeal. We therefore adopt the brief of the Assistant Attorney-General as the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Austin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Ex Parte IsbellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.