Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Isbell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1905No. 2969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for violating the local option law in Hill County. The indictment is in proper form, and presented by the grand jury on April 2, 1904, and numbered on the docket 6886. On Hovember 26, 1904, an order was entered by the county court, dismissing said cause Ho. 6886. The judgment of dismissal does not contain the reasons of the county attorney upon which the motion to dismiss was based. However, the judgment recites that a written statement waS filed by the State’s attorney asking for permission to dismiss said cause. Ho motion of the county attorney was filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Tullis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ex parte RuskCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Diseren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API