Austin v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
Lately, this court has been confronted with an increasing number of appeals involving negotiated-plea agreements in which the district attorney has agreed not to prosecute uncharged offenses if the defendant would agree to a “read in” of these uncharged offenses and to allow the court to take such offenses into consideration in sentencing him on the charged offense. The validity of such an agreement not to prosecute has not yet been the subject of a defense in a subsequent suit, but the question has arisen in connection with the attempted withdrawal of a plea of guilty. Since the so-called…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re ValleMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Embry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. GallionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- David L. Hartjes v. Jeffrey P. EndicottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- State v. HamptonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RivestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. White v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.