Legal Opinion
State v. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 23, 1996No. C2-94-2469PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant Peter Dean Paul was arrested at his home in Jordan, Minnesota, and charged with the misdemeanor offense of driving under the influence of alcohol. At the omnibus hearing, Paul pleaded not guilty to the charge of driving under the influence of alcohol and moved to suppress all evidence obtained against him on the grounds that the police officer’s warrantless entry into his home to make the arrest violated the Fourth Amendment. The district court denied the motion, ruling that the officer’s warrantless entry into Paul’s home was justified under the doctrine of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LeggSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- State v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. FergusonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re the Welfare of B.R.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.