First Nat. Bank of Hailey v. G. V. B. Min. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho
On demurrers to pleas in intervention filed by Arthur Brown and Henry Aplington, eacli claiming the product of the mortgaged mining property during the receivership.
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, District Judge.
The action of the complainant against the defendant mining company for lire foreclosure of a mortgage, given by it to complainant upon the lied Elephant group of mines, to *450secure its debt, has been reduced to judgment in favor of complainant; but pending the action the proceeds of ores, to the amount of $7,617.34, resulting from the operation of the mines by Henry Aplington, as the lessee of the defendant company, were placed in the possession of the court’s receiver, to await the conclusion of the action. Arthur Brown and said Aplington have intervened, claiming such…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Peterson v. BeggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- G. V. B. Min. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Madar v. NormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Sather Lease--Thomas Sather & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Cascaden v. DunbarDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.