Legal Opinion

Sather Lease--Thomas Sather & Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided May 13, 1932No. Docket No. 31979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*88OPINION.

Matthews:

The only question in this proceeding is whether the petitioner was an association taxable as a corporation, or a partnership, the income of which is taxable to the individual members. A very similar situation was presented in the case of Joe Gilovich & Co., 6 B. T. A. 864, wherein we held that a group of individuals operating under a mining lease constituted a partnership and not an association. The petitioner in this proceeding was, in its organization and operation, very like the petitioner in that case. It had no officers, did not carrjr on its business upon any corporate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Kahn v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Settembre v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Drake v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. First Nat. Bank of Hailey v. G. V. B. Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sather Lease--Thomas Sather & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API