Legal Opinion

Smith v. Finch

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 29, 2009No. S08G1845PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.

We granted certiorari to examine the propriety of the so-called “hindsight” jury instruction prescribed for use in medical malpractice actions at Section 62.311 of the Georgia Suggested Pattern Jury Instructions: Civil Cases. Though the Court of Appeals has generally approved the use of this jury instruction, this Court has never considered it. Finding a portion of the hindsight instruction to be inaccurate and misleading, we disapprove the instruction in its current form and reverse the judgment below.

Appellants Clay and Tracie Smith sued various physicians and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Munroe v. Universal Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Kenney v. Piedmont HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Haynes v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Dent v. Memorial Hospital of AdelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Stolte v. FaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Tyner v. Matta-TroncosoSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Condra v. Atlanta Orthopaedic Group P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. SOUTHEASTERN PAIN SPECIALISTS, P.C. v. BROWN (Three Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  5. Se. Pain Specialists, P.C. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API