Legal Opinion

Donawitz v. Danek

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1977PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWachtler, J.

We are presented with yet another of the plethora of difficult questions which have arisen out of this court’s holdings in Seider v Roth (17 NY2d 111) and Simpson v Loehmann (21 NY2d 305, mot for rearg den 21 NY2d 990). For the first time this court has been asked to pass upon the propriety of extending this doctrine by allowing a SeiderSimpson jurisdictional attachment in a case involving a nonresident plaintiff and a nonresident defendant arising out of alleged acts of negligence which occurred in another State. In our view the doctrine explicated in Seider v Roth (supra) and Simpson v…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Seider v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Simpson v. LoehmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Gager v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Barbara G. Holzsager, of the Estate of Donald M. Holzsager, Deceased, and Barbara G. Holzsager, Individually v. The Valley HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Higby v. MahoneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Intermeat, Inc. v. American Poultry Incorporated and a & W FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API