Legal Opinion · Dissent

Be-Lo Stores v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1997No. Nos. 96-1575, 96-1657Published

1DissentErvin, Circuit Judge

If the facts of this case cannot sustain a bargaining order, then almost none will. Substantial evidence plainly supports the Board’s findings of nearly 80 violations, many of them so-called “hallmark” violations, the vast majority of them unbriefed by Be-Lo and not even discussed by the majority here. Among the particulars that the majority does discuss, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that Be-Lo violated the Act when it sent its employees a mock “pink slip” just before the election, which the Board found to constitute an actual threat of job loss if the employees voted for…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API