Be-Lo Stores v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentErvin, Circuit Judge
If the facts of this case cannot sustain a bargaining order, then almost none will. Substantial evidence plainly supports the Board’s findings of nearly 80 violations, many of them so-called “hallmark” violations, the vast majority of them unbriefed by Be-Lo and not even discussed by the majority here. Among the particulars that the majority does discuss, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that Be-Lo violated the Act when it sent its employees a mock “pink slip” just before the election, which the Board found to constitute an actual threat of job loss if the employees voted for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.