Legal Opinion

Cartwright v. Burlington Northern Railroad

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1995No. Civ. J-C-94-305PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EISELE, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant Burlington Northern Railroad Company’s (Burlington’s) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have responded to the present motion, opposing the relief sought. For the reasons expressed in the following opinion, Burlington’s motion will be granted.

I

The standards governing the Court’s consideration of a motion for summary judgment are well-established. Under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Bryan v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
  3. Dallari v. Southern Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API