Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Little League Baseball, Inc.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 8, 1992No. CIV 92-1282-PHX-EHCPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EARL H. CARROLL, District Judge.

Background

On July 24, 1991, Defendants Little League Baseball, Inc. and its President and Chief Executive Officer Dr. Creighton J. Hale adopted the following policy regarding base coaching:... (coach in wheel chair) may coach from the dugout, but cannot be in the coachers box. Little League must consider the safety of the youth playing the game, and they should not have the added concern of avoiding a collision with a wheel chair during their participation in the game.

Plaintiff, who is confined to a wheelchair due to a spinal cord injury, has coached…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Nat. Org. for Women v. Little League Baseball, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Loewenstein v. AMATEUR SOFTBALL ASS'NNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  2. Hutchinson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  3. D'Amico v. New York State Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993
  4. Mario Echazabal v. Chevron Usa, Inc. Irwin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Casey Martin v. Pga Tour, Inc., a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API