Mario Echazabal v. Chevron Usa, Inc. Irwin Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge TROTT.
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
In this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), we held in an earlier opinion that the “direct threat” defense provided by 42 U.S.C. § 12113 in an ADA discrimination action does not include threats to the employee’s own health. *1026Echazabal v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 226 F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th Cir.2000). In Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal, 536 U.S. 73, 122 S.Ct. 2045, 153 L.Ed.2d 82 (2002) (“Echazabal ”), the Supreme Court reversed and remanded, holding that the direct…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Michael Nall v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Jarvis v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Timothy Mayo v. Pcc StructuralsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Littlefield v. State, ex rel. Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Michael Nall v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.