Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Ewert
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 9, 1923No. Nos. 5804, 5805PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
These cases, although separately instituted, were, by consent of parties, tried as one, as they involved the same issues, based on the same leases, and might properly have been consolidated and brought to this court hy one appeal.
The facts briefly stated are: Abram Dardenne, Jr., a Quapaw Indian, was the owner of the land in controversy, allotted to him as a *11member of the Quapaw Tribe of Indians. On August 2, 1912, he executed a mining lease to A. E. Harvey for a term of 10 years. It contained the following provision:
“If oil or any mineral or other substances of value…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hemmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Ewert v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- United States v. HemmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Rader v. Star Mill & Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Heritage Railways, Inc. v. HirouDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Moxley Moxley v. Atlantic Refining CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Niagara Mohawk v. Consolidated RailCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010