Legal Opinion
Niagara Mohawk v. Consolidated Rail
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 24, 2010No. 08-3843-cv(L) 08-4007-cv(XAP)Published
1Opinion of the Court
08-3843-cv(L); 08-4007-cv(XAP) Niagara Mohawk v. Consolidated Rail 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 F OR THE S ECOND C IRCUIT 4 5 6 7 August Term, 2008 8 9 (Argued: June 9, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2010) 10 11 Docket Nos. 08-3843-cv (L); 08-4007-cv (XAP) 12 13 14 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, 15 16 Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, 17 18 –v.– 19 20 Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 21 22 Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, 23 24 United States Steel Company, Richard B. Slote, in his 25 capacity as personal representative of the estate of Edwin 26 D. King, and Portec, Inc., 27 28…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Roth v. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Uttecht v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.