Legal Opinion

Cram v. Sickel

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1897No. 7337PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

George F. Oram sued Bernard Sickel and Luther P. Ludden, copartners, in the district court of Lancaster county to recover a balance on account for goods sold and delivered by Oram to Sickel and Ludden. The defendants below had a verdict and judgment and Oram prosecutes here a petition in error.

To a proper understanding of the points presented in this case a short statement of the facts admitted and established by the finding of the jury becomes essential.

Prior to August, 1892, Sickel and Ludden dissolved their copartnership, the agreement of dissolution providing that Sickel should…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Johnston v. Milwaukee & Wyoming Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Taylor v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Nolan v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  5. O'Shea v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holt v. SchneiderNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Nebraska State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Nebraska Wesleyan University v. ParkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Dappen v. WeberNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API