State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
The key point in the trial below was the identity of the driver of the truck. The court permitted the arresting officer, over objection, to testify that defendant admitted that he was the driver of the truck. At the time of the purported admission the defendant was in custody and being questioned by the officer.
An admission made by a criminal defendant while in custody, in response to questioning by law enforcement officers, may not be used in evidence by the State unless the State shows, in a voir dire hearing, that the defendant received the warnings required by Miranda v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. VickersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. ShuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. GoinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974