Legal Opinion

State v. Yancey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1982No. 819SC1351PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant’s first assignment of error is to the court’s denial of his motion to suppress the identification testimony of Elizabeth Currin and his motion for a lineup. G.S. 15A-281 provides:

“A person arrested for or charged with an offense punishable by imprisonment for more than one year may request that nontestimonial identification procedures be conducted upon himself. If it appears that the results of specific nontestimonial identification procedures will be of material aid in determining whether the defendant committed the offense, the judge to whom the request was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NolenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. BarnardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. AbdullahCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API