Legal Opinion

Fidelity Investment Co. v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1959No. 41,201Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court striking part of the separate replies of plaintiffs, Fidelity Investment Company and John Torkelson who, for clarity, will be referred to hereafter as Fidelity and Torkelson. Defendant William Bradford will he referred to as William, and the other defendants as follows: Bradford Drilling and Pump Service, Inc., as the Bradford Com*267pany, Gene Reynolds as Gene, and the Reynolds Drilling-Pump Service Company as the Reynolds Company.

Fidelity and the Business Mens’ Assurance Company, both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunter Milling Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Minter v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Strangers' Rest Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API