Legal Opinion

In Re Polk

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1999No. A084596PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, Acting P. J.

I. Introduction

Elvin James Polk, who is confined at Atascadero State Hospital, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was committed to the state hospital pursuant to an order of commitment under Penal Code section 1370 after he was found incompetent to stand trial. We issued an order to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted. Petitioner contends that his confinement is unlawful because the three-year time limit set forth in section 1370, subdivision (c)(1), has expired. Petitioner’s contention raises a question of first impression…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Conservatorship of HofferberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Jackson v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In Re MilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. In re Taitano, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. In re WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API