Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2017No. S235549PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiu, J.

*112 *99 A criminal defendant who is found incompetent to stand trial may be involuntarily committed for the purpose of determining if he or she is *100 likely to regain competence. ( Pen. Code, § 1370, subd. (a)(1)(B) ; all undesignated statutory references are to this code.) But the duration of commitment may not exceed " 'the reasonable period of time necessary *113 to determine whether there is a substantial probability that [the defendant] will attain that capacity in the foreseeable future.' " ( In re Davis (1973) 8 Cal.3d 798 , 804, 106 Cal.Rptr. 178 , 505 P.2d 1018 ( Davis ), quoting Jackson v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenwood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Conservatorship of HofferberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. GodlewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. BuenrostroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. Jackson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Barron v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Barron v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Chavez v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API