Legal Opinion
Leepson v. Holland
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*85OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
Petitioner initially commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, however, on consent of all the parties, the action has been converted to one for declaratory judgment. It challenges the constitutionality of the Rent Regulation Reform Act of 1993 (L 1993, ch 253) (Reform Act) which, among other things, provides for the decontrol of "high rent” apartments occupied by "high income” households.
Respondent, Joseph H. Holland, as Commissioner of the State of New York, Division of Housing and Community Renewal — Office of Rent Administration (DHCR)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Cook v. City of BinghamtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nestor v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Leepson v. HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Nestor v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999