Legal Opinion

Goins v. Puleo

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1999No. 279A98Published

1Opinion of the Court

512 S.E.2d 748 (1999)

350 N.C. 277

Juliene McClellan GOINS

v.

Joel G. PULEO, M.D., Ellen A. Puleo, M.D., and Pinehurst Women's Clinic, P.A.

No. 279A98.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 9, 1999.

Gill & Dow, by Douglas R. Gill, Southern Pines, for plaintiff-appellee.

Walker Barwick Clark & Allen, L.L.P., by Robert D. Walker, Jr. and Jeffrey T. Ammons, Goldsboro, for defendant-appellants.

MITCHELL, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented for review before this Court is whether the Court of Appeals erred by affirming the trial court's order denying defendants' motion for summary judgment based on…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Balson v. DoddsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Deborah D. Bergemann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Goins v. PuleoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API