Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Kingsley Arms, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, J.S.C.
The purpose of this supplemental opinion is to clarify the reasons for the entry of the particular form of order that memorialized the rulings contained in the Court’s written opinion of August 31, 1993. 271 N.J.Super. 68, 637 A.2d 1303.
In the earlier opinion, the motion of the Asbury Park Housing Authority (“APHA”) to quash the levies placed on its bank accounts was granted, and the motion of plaintiff Kingsley Arms, Inc. (“Kingsley”) for an order mandating the payment of the amounts previously adjudicated due, by way earlier motions for summary judgment, was also granted. On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- BOR. OF EATONTOWN v. DanskinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- State ex rel. Sho-Me Power Corp. v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Grosso v. City of PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MASTEC RENEWABLES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. VS. SUNLIGHT GENERAL MERCER SOLAR, LLC (L-0336-14, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020