Legal Opinion
Figarola v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 19, 2003No. 4D02-1039PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
841 So.2d 576 (2003)
Jorge FIGAROLA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D02-1039.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 19, 2003.
Jorge Figarola, Arcadia, pro se.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Karen Finkle, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
KLEIN, J.
Appellant seeks review of the denial of his rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence, which argued that the assessment of scoresheet points for sexual penetration, resulting in a sentence beyond the statutory maximum, violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Burrows v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Modest v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.