ZeniMax Media, Inc. v. Oculus VR, LLC
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*700 ORDER
JORGE A. SOLIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Now before the Court is Defendant Fa-eebook’s (“Facebook”) Motion to Dismiss Counts 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6, filed September 19, 2014. Doc. 47. Plaintiffs filed a Response on October 10, 2014. Doc. 67. Defendant filed a Reply on October 24, 2014. Doc. 79. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, the evidence, and the applicable law, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
I. Introduction1
This is a dispute about who owns intellectual property that was vital in creating a virtual-reality (“VR”) headset. Plaintiffs, who are in the video game…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A Boheme Design, L.L.C. v. Bruce Kelly Properties Limited Liability Company and Charles Bruce KellyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2026
- Moates v. Facebook Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
- Stross v. PR Advisors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- Torsh Inc. v. Audio Enhancement, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023