Legal Opinion

Swank v. Terex Utilities, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 2015No. 101027; A152465PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Plaintiff was injured while working for his employer, ES&A Sign and Awning Company (ES&A), when the boom of a crane, along with the basket in which plaintiff was riding, fell due to the failure of the crane’s rotator-bearing assembly. Plaintiff brought an action against defendant Manitex, Inc., a Texas corporation, claiming that Manitex was negligent in several respects in conducting a “field campaign” to address a defect in the crane’s rotator-bearing assembly, which resulted in ES&A failing to properly repair the defect.1 After raising the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Helicopter Transport Services, LLC v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  3. M. C. v. Quest Global, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Burton v. Air France-KLMDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  5. M. C. v. Quest Global, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API