Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Williams Mfg. Co. v. Prock

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1950No. 13025_1Published

1Concurrence

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge,

specially concurring.

The rule that denies relief to a party to an illegal contract upon the maxim, In pari delicto potior est conditio defendentis, “is adopted, not for the benefit of either party and not to punish either of them, but for the benefit of the public.” Lewis v. Davis, 145 Tex. 468, 477, 199 S.W.2d 146, 151.

“There is often involved, in reaching a decision as to granting or withholding relief, the question whether the policy against assisting a wrongdoer outweighs the policy against permitting unjust enrichment of one party at the expense of the other. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Floyd v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Pioneer Mutual Compensation Corp. v. DiazTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Graham v. DeanTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hayes v. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API