Legal Opinion

Prudence Mutual Casualty Co. v. Grimm

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 1970No. 69-70PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALDEN, Judge.

Charles B. Grimm sued Prudence Mutual Casualty Company because of the company’s refusal to pay proceeds of a non valued insurance contract which covered theft of Grimm’s automobile. The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a ver-diet for Grimm in the sum of $1800.00 and judgment in that sum, plus $1200.00 in at- , . , , . torney s fees and plus costs. The company appeals. We reverse.

There is no dispute as to the dis-positive material facts. From them we say, as a matter of law, that Grimm did not have an insurable interest in the vehicle at the time of the alleged theft.

Secti…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skaff v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Lighting Fixture Supply Co. v. Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  3. Peninsular Fire Insurance Co. v. FowlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grimm v. Prudence Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API