Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 4, 1969No. 68-699PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANN, Judge.

This appeal is by the plaintiffs and is from a final judgment for the defendants based on an order which granted their motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint.

The Smiths, plaintiffs below, were bona fide purchasers for value of a 1965 Cadillac automobile.

The defendants, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, issued a policy of insurance on the car insuring the Smiths against loss by theft. The car was stolen from them whereupon they notified the insuror and filed a claim under their policy. The police recovered the car and ascertained that it was a stolen vehicle…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skaff v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Horton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Grimm v. Prudence Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Cueto v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  5. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co. v. GrimmDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API