Legal Opinion
In Re Rinegold
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1970No. Crim. 9136PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, J.
Simultaneously with the direct appeal (People v. Rinegold, No. 8525, ante, p. 711 [92 Cal.Rptr. 12]) from the merits of a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245), this court has been directed to consider a petition for writ of habeas corpus subsequently filed. Although we have concluded that there are insufficient grounds for the relief requested, the petition presents a question of first impression as to the application of Pineda v. Craven (9th Cir. 1970) 424 F.2d 369,
Petitioner contends that his…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Griggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. PenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Conservatorship of ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. RinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. JoynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.