Legal Opinion
United States v. Vitasafe Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 4, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 781-64PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, District Judge.
In an opinion filed January 24, 1964, United States v. “Vitasafe Formula M * * *”, D.C., 226 F.Supp. 266, this court granted the government a decree of condemnation for certain vitamin products and advertising materials used in connection therewith, earlier held to constitute labeling therefor, 226 F.Supp. at 269, footnote 1. The grounds for the decree were that the assertions contained in the labeling gave impressions to the user which were misleading and contrary to fact in violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.; 226 F.Supp. at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. 46 CARTONS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- United States v. " VITASAFE FORMULA M"District Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
- United States v. 3963 BottlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- United States v. 91 PACKAGES, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Vitasafe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- United States v. An Undetermined Number of Shipping Packages, Etc., Vitasafe Corporation, United States of America v. Vitasafe Corporation, a Corporation, Nutritional Quality Controls, Inc., Acorporation, the Dollar Vitamine Plan, Inc., a Corporation, Life Nutrition, Inc., a Corporation, International Oil and Metals Corporation, a Corporation, Dr. Parkermedicine Company, a Corporation, Philip S. Volosov, an Individual and Henry d.cohen, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965