Legal Opinion
United States v. Vitasafe Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 27, 1965No. Nos. 14964, 15066PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The District Court, in an in rem proceeding under the Federal Food, Drug *866and Cosmetic Act1 (Appeal No. 14964), condemned and forfeited (1) some 900 seized packages of Vitasafe vitamin-mineral capsules, which it found to be “foods” 2 and “drugs” 3 introduced into interstate commerce, with “labeling” claims that were false and misleading, and with inadequate directions for their use;4 and (2), approximately 3,730,000 pieces of written, printed and graphic material designed to promote the sale of the capsules, seized in the warehouse of the Vitasafe Corporation in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. 353 Cases Mountain Valley Mineral Water Mountain Valley Sales Company, a Corporation, John G. Scott, and H. B. McFarlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. UrbuteitSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Yair HoltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Hypertherm, Inc. v. Precision Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.