Legal Opinion

United States v. " VITASAFE FORMULA M"

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1964No. Civ. 875-60PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANE, District Judge.

This action, which arises under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., was initiated by the government’s filing of a libel of information in this court wherein the United States, having seized a quantity of vitamin and mineral capsules and labeling for the articles located at Mid-dlesex, New Jersey, under powers granted the United States by 21 U.S.C. § 334, sought to have these articles condemned. The items were in the possession of the Vitasafe Corporation, Division of Consolidated Sun Ray, Inc., and also in the possession of the United States…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. 353 Cases Mountain Valley Mineral Water Mountain Valley Sales Company, a Corporation, John G. Scott, and H. B. McFarlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. 8 Cartons, Containing "Plantation 'The Original' Etc., Molasses."District Court, W.D. New York · 1951

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Hanson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
  3. Nutrilab, Inc. v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Vitasafe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API