Thomas M. Rettig, Cross-Appellees v. Kent City School District, Cross-Appellant, and Kenneth Cardinal
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal and cross-appeal from the final order of the District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in this action involving the education of a handicapped child.
The district court entered extensive findings of fact below and reference is made to that opinion for a full exposition of the background of this controversy. See, Ret-tig v. Kent City School District, 539 F.Supp. 768 (N.D.Ohio 1981). It is sufficient to restate here that Thomas M. Rettig (Thomas) is a severely handicapped teen-age child. Thomas displays symptoms of autism and is also believed to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rowley v. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Vander Malle v. AmbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Rettig v. Kent City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1981
3Cited by20 opinions
- Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Town of Burlington v. Department of Education for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Town of Burlington v. Department of Education for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, John Doe, Etc., Town of Burlington v. Department of Education for the Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Cordrey v. EuckertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Straube v. Florida Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.