Legal Opinion

State v. Matsamas

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1991No. 880048PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Tony W. Matsamas appeals from his jury convictions of rape of a child and sodomy on a child. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-5-402.1, -403.1 (1990). Matsa-mas argues, inter alia, that his convictions should be reversed because the trial court failed to make proper findings under section 76-5-411(2) of the Code before admitting evidence of the child victim’s hearsay statements. Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-411(2) (1990). We agree and reverse and remand. *1050For that reason, we need not reach defendant’s other arguments.

On February 23, 1986, four-year-old S.N. and her family attended…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. TuttleUtah Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Felix v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. State v. SealeUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. OlsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API