Legal Opinion

Joseph E. Glaum v. Colby Braun and Joseph Joyce

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided March 31, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00146Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Joseph E. Glaum, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) vs. ) Case No. 1:24-cv-146 ) Colby Braun and Joseph Joyce, ) ) Defendants. ) Plaintiff, Joseph E. Glaum, an inmate proceeding without counsel, was permitted to proceed with First Amendment claims alleging (1) interference with free flow of mail while incarcerated, and (2) lack of access to the courts. (Doc. 38 at 24; Doc. 51 at 10). The claim for lack of access to the courts was limited to Glaum’s effort to seek postconviction relief in state court. The permitted claims were limited…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API