Legal Opinion

State v. Curie

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 25, 1973No. 7312SC539PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The only assignment of error brought forward and argued by defendant relates to the failure of the court to allow defendant to testify with respect to his méntal and psychiatric problems. After hearing the proffered testimony on voir dire in the absence of the jury, the court ruled it inadmissible.

Pertinent portions of the excluded testimony are summarized as follows: Following his arrest, defendant was sent to Dorothea Dix Hospital for observation but he would not cooperate with the doctors there because they had long hair, were “weirdos,” and he had no confidence in them.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . LattimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. GastonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. MessickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API