United States v. Glaze
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COOK, Judge:
In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a special court-martial of numerous violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. We granted review to consider whether appellant’s plea of guilty to one of the offenses, resisting apprehension, was improvident. C.M.A., 8 M.J. 177 (1979).
During the inquiry into accused’s understanding of the meaning and legal effect of a plea of guilty, the trial judge reviewed the elements of the apprehension offense and then inquired, “What’s the Government’s theory as to how the resistance was accomplished?”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. CunninghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. StoeckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. CaverNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
- United States v. MurrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Garcia-LopezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.