Legal Opinion

United States v. Shane Vandergroen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2020No. 19-10075PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10075 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:18-cr-00133-PJH-1 SHANE MAURITZ VANDERGROEN, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 13, 2020 San Francisco, California Filed July 7, 2020 Before: Michelle T. Friedland and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges, and Jed S. Rakoff, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge Rakoff * The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, Senior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Carsten RosenowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Tamaran BontempsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Christian EstrellaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. Marc WillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. Aaron Holmes, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API