Legal Opinion

United States v. Carsten Rosenow

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 27, 2022No. 20-50052PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50052 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cr-03430- WQH-1 CARSTEN IGOR ROSENOW, AKA Carlos Senta, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 8, 2021 Pasadena, California Filed April 27, 2022 Before: Susan P. Graber, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Forrest; Dissent by Judge Graber 2 UNITED STATES V. ROSENOW…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. MaherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  2. State v. DiawOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  3. United States v. RosenscheinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. Aaron Holmes, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. John KramerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API