Legal Opinion

People v. Woods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 25, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support his conviction of robbery in the first degree as an accomplice. We disagree. "Accessorial liability requires only that defendant, acting with the mental culpability required for the commission of the crime, intentionally aid another in the conduct constituting the offense” (People v Johnson, 142 AD2d 952, lv denied 72 NY2d 1046; see, People v Flagg, 180 AD2d 813). Viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Williams, 84 NY2d 925, 926), the evidence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. New York Ass'n of Homes & Services for Aging, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. RicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API