People v. Ricks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]) and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (§ 165.50), defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to convict him of robbery in the first degree *1266as an accomplice. We reject that contention (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we conclude that the jury could have reasonably inferred that defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Demitrus B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. FacenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KeeganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.