Legal Opinion

People v. Lockwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of County Court convicting him upon a jury verdict

*849of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [a]). Defendant moved to suppress the identification testimony of the victim on the ground that the showup identification procedure was improper. The court properly denied the motion. The showup identification procedure was conducted less than a half hour after the incident and defendant was transported only a block and a half from the point where he was taken into custody (see, People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533, 537;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. DuuvonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. BlancheNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API