Carnahan v. Fayetteville
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.
■ This suit by the taxpayers, residents in the annex to the original sewer district to the city of Fayetteville, challenges the validity of said annex, claiming it is, in effect, two separate improvements, because of the inclusion of two entirely separate and distinct tracts of land in one improvement and because of the excessive assessment of benefits in the annex, exceeding in proportion those authorized in the original sewer district. It is conceded that the district otherwise was duly organized and the assessment of benefits legally made.
It appears that the original Sewer District No. 1…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Little Rock v. KatzensteinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Reitzammer v. Desha Road Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
- Board of Improvement of Sewer Improvement District No. 1 v. PollardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Little Rock v. BoulliounSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pratt v. Water District No. 79Washington Supreme Court · 1961
- Davidson v. Sewer Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930