Holt v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Judge.
Charles Will Holt brings this appeal from his conviction and sentence of theft by deception, OCGA § 16-8-3. Held:
1. “Where the appellee in this court points out no material inaccuracy or incompleteness of statement in appellant’s brief, and makes no additional statement and cites no additional parts of the transcript, he will be held to have consented to a decision on appellant’s statement of the case; and this court will accept appellant’s statement as prima facie true and decide the case on the basis of this statement and the evidence cited and quoted in support thereof.”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilkie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- CINCINNATI, NO &C. R. CO. v. HilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Colson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Banton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Hankinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gooch v. TudorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Stratacos v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- McMahon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Scott v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.