Legal Opinion

Scott v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1992No. A91A2261PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Chief Judge.

Sandra Scott brought suit against William Chapman to recover damages for injuries she incurred as a result of a collision between the car in which she was a passenger and a car driven by Chapman. Since Chapman was uninsured, State Farm Insurance Company, Scott’s uninsured motorist insurance carrier, was served pursuant to OCGA § 33-7-11 (d). Judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of Scott. Finding the verdict inadequate, Scott filed this appeal.

1. Appellant contends the trial court erred by denying her motion for a mistrial. After the direct examination of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Seay v. Urban Medical Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Durrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Russell v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. WILLIAMS v. HARVEYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  3. Walker v. Bruno's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Gonzalez v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API