Legal Opinion

Gooch v. Tudor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 16, 2009No. A09A0299PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Dale Gooch appeals from two separate orders of the trial court, entered following a bench trial; he asserts that the trial court erred in: (1) finding in favor of Dede Tudor on her claim against Gooch for malicious prosecution; (2) awarding Tudor punitive damages; and (3) granting Tudor’s motion for a directed verdict on Gooch’s claim for trover and cancelling the notice of lis pendens he had filed against Tudor’s property. Discerning no error, we affirm.

While we apply a de novo standard of review to any questions of law decided by the trial court, factual findings…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Hicks v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Kicklighter v. KicklighterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Medoc Corp. v. KeelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Vann v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Turnage v. KasperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Forshee v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. In the Interest of M. S. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Washington v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API